The Books:
A taste of honey and The Sorcerer of the Wildeeps by Kai Ashante Wilson.
The Rating: I loved both these odes to queer love and lives, but in different ways.
To Note : Though A taste of honey is marketed as a sequel, the novellas are hardly related to each other, other than being set in the same world of magicians practicing sciences whose origins have been so lost to time that they are indecipherable from sorcery or divinity.
The plot of Honey, in 20 words or less: A nobleman falls in love with a foreign (male) soldier. Will love or family duty prevail?
Why I loved it: My queer bleeding heart was pulled deep into the heartbreak of this tale as old as time; where either choice brings as much sorrow and loss as the other. And Wilson excelled in bringing me into the heart of his character's triumphs and foibles while also making clear how family and society shape the hero to be as simultaneously naive and good hearted as he is.
Because this novella is a meditation on the vagaries of choice, it is also more driven by character study than by action. For this reason, I see it as occupying a unique space rarely tread in the action focused world of sci-fi and fantasy.
Some call it a romance, but to me it is more a philosophical inquiry into not only how the ties that bind us constrain individual choice but also how our choices leave ripples in the lives of all those around us. It is a novella that forces us to set aside notions of good or bad and merely wrestle with the implications of our decisions, deeply bringing us into the bitterweet heart of both love and loss.
The Sorceror plot, in 20 words or less: While love compells the Sorceror to journey with his Captain's band of mercenaries across the Wildeeps, dangers hunt them.
Why I loved it:
More action driven than Honey, The Sorceror is a study on class, race, and the ethics of violence in a world recovering from a long ago apocalypse. These background textures are exquisitely rendered through the dialogue between the mercenaries and the Sorceror's personal observations, deepening the fast moving plot with complex questions on how to make moral choices in a violent world, and how love itself is both fool hardy and redeeming.
Image by brandon-ramos.com
Thursday, December 27, 2018
Monday, December 17, 2018
Put those Kids to Work! (Solutions to Hunger, part 1)
The Green New Deal is a policy proposal initially born in the United States, but it's one I believe should be adopted the world over. It is an economic stimulus package that would guarantee a Green job to every citizen; finally tying the economy to ecological reality. I will be blogging and tweeting about how this kind of a package could be used to restore our crumbling ecological and social fabric.
Today I'm blogging about how the New Green Deal could be used to fund the creation of community gardens; solving childhood hunger and creating green educational spaces in schools.
Hunger is something I think a lot about. I went through enough financially tough times in my twenties to feel the spectre of food scarcity haunt me. (Don't worry Mom, I got enough to eat). But still, there were times when I was consumed with anxiety, wondering how I was going to both pay rent and nourish myself. It was not always such an easy question to answer. And as one of my even more broke friends wisely noted, there's only so much lentils and rice and spinach you can eat before you begin to feel hungry for something more.
Today I'm blogging about how the New Green Deal could be used to fund the creation of community gardens; solving childhood hunger and creating green educational spaces in schools.
Hunger is something I think a lot about. I went through enough financially tough times in my twenties to feel the spectre of food scarcity haunt me. (Don't worry Mom, I got enough to eat). But still, there were times when I was consumed with anxiety, wondering how I was going to both pay rent and nourish myself. It was not always such an easy question to answer. And as one of my even more broke friends wisely noted, there's only so much lentils and rice and spinach you can eat before you begin to feel hungry for something more.
When I lived in countries like Haiti, I got to see the effects of hunger first hand. The kids just weren't tall enough for their ages; their hair crumbly and bleached blond from a lack of nutrition, their little bellies sticking out beneath tight ribs. When I got back to Canada, I couldn't handle the abundance of food. Grocery stores with so much variety, available 24-7 seemed like an unthinkable luxury compared to the once a week market and small corner stores that sustained me in Haiti. Morally and psychologically, I objected. For this and the reasons of conserving areable land for the future generations (cows eat more grains than what energy we are able to harvest from them with current factory farming methods) I became a vegetarian for four years. I did stop when I became intolerant to dairy and gluten (a story for another, more personal blog) and currently I switch my meals between vegan, vegetarian, and omnivore as I try to listen carefully to what my body needs nutritionally while also being sensitive to the carrying capacity of the earth. Again, I realize that these issues are complex-- but I believe it is a moral imperative to wrestle with these complex questions of how to live responsibly on the earth in these troubled times of global climate change associated as it is with fishery collapse, water shortages, crop failures, and famine.
One lesson that stands out to me from my undergraduate comes from the late great Jane Jacobs: there is more than enough food on the earth to feed us all. Even today, this is true. The problem is not one of supply, but one of distribution. In other words, we as citizens must call our governments into account for not feeding the hungry. I find it especially egregious that in first world countries where we are swimming in excess food to the point that we waste more food than we eat, people are still suffering from hunger.
I present to you: but one of many models for solving food insecurity. This is a national, not international, model.
I believe all publicly funded schools in Canada, from grade schools to universities, should involve their students in school gardens. This can and should be implemented as a hands-on part of the curriculum to learn from and study nature. It could even involve a variety of different classes; the technology class builds the full-spectrum LED lights, the environmental science class plants the seeds and monitors them, the cooking class harvests the food, prepares and distributes it. At higher levels of education, the more complex questions are studied. It would be a form of spiral learning, wherein the basic principals of sowing, harvest, preparation, become more and more complex and nuanced as the education levels become higher.
There are also many opportunities for community involvement. The schools could involve senior's organisations, volunteer clubs, religious organizations, to coordinate the care of the gardens during the summers. This would require hiring a coordinator, most likely, but think what could be done! Holidays like labour day and civic holiday could be spent at harvest festivals, wherein the whole community comes together to preserve the food, whether by drying, smoking, or canning.
I grew up in a church community where once a year, we'd make a big fire, and each contribute our own ingredients to a soup. When you know that kind of communal generousity and commitment to one another's well-being, you just can't understand why anyone wouldn't want to make a better way of caring for each other.
Review: The Scribe of Siena
Wherein I review sci-fi and fantasy books in the format of a conversation with a mildly rabid fellow reader. Bold are the questions my (entirely imaginary) and definitely adversarial blog reader asks me.
The Book : The Scribe of Siena by Melodie Winawer.
The Rating: I liked it.
The Plot, in 20 words or less: A semi-psychic neurosurgeon struggling with her historian brother's death becomes obsessed with finishing his study on the Plague in medieval Siena.
Why I Liked It: This book is meticulous in its world building, obviously well researched without shoving it in the reader's face that times in medieval Europe are not what you think. Happily, the descriptions of the customs and setting of medieval Italy were used for the purpose of building the character's experience and situating her struggles rather than feeling like an essay on how things worked in Italy in the 14th century.
I also found myself so pulled in to the medieval characters worldviews I cringed at times when the main character judged other's actions from a twenty first century perspective; that was how masterfully Winawer was able to draw me into the inner world of medieval Italy.
Things I didn't like: the rape scene seemed extraneous, exploitative of a woman's pain without any real purpose of building the plot other than to character build the man.
Maybe you just don't like rape scenes because they're too icky for your delicate constitution: True in general, but still I find that authors like Rivers Soloman managed to write rape scenes without being exploitative. Soloman portrayed the horrors and the impact of systemic violence against women without the scenes feeling objectifying.
Unfortunately, in portraying the rapist's reactions to the girl's pain, Winawer forced the reader to also see the victim through this dehumanizing light as well. Icky; and yes, I realize that was the point. But this is my review, so I'm free to say I didn't like that part and didn't feel it had a strong enough purpose in the book to be worth the vicarious ick I experienced through reading it.
The Book : The Scribe of Siena by Melodie Winawer.
![]() |
| The Scribe of Siena by Melodie Winawer |
The Plot, in 20 words or less: A semi-psychic neurosurgeon struggling with her historian brother's death becomes obsessed with finishing his study on the Plague in medieval Siena.
Why I Liked It: This book is meticulous in its world building, obviously well researched without shoving it in the reader's face that times in medieval Europe are not what you think. Happily, the descriptions of the customs and setting of medieval Italy were used for the purpose of building the character's experience and situating her struggles rather than feeling like an essay on how things worked in Italy in the 14th century.
I also found myself so pulled in to the medieval characters worldviews I cringed at times when the main character judged other's actions from a twenty first century perspective; that was how masterfully Winawer was able to draw me into the inner world of medieval Italy.
Things I didn't like: the rape scene seemed extraneous, exploitative of a woman's pain without any real purpose of building the plot other than to character build the man.
Maybe you just don't like rape scenes because they're too icky for your delicate constitution: True in general, but still I find that authors like Rivers Soloman managed to write rape scenes without being exploitative. Soloman portrayed the horrors and the impact of systemic violence against women without the scenes feeling objectifying.
Unfortunately, in portraying the rapist's reactions to the girl's pain, Winawer forced the reader to also see the victim through this dehumanizing light as well. Icky; and yes, I realize that was the point. But this is my review, so I'm free to say I didn't like that part and didn't feel it had a strong enough purpose in the book to be worth the vicarious ick I experienced through reading it.
Wednesday, December 5, 2018
Review: The Name of the Wind
Wherein I review sci-fi and fantasy books in the format of a conversation with a mildly rabid fellow reader. Bold are the questions my (entirely imaginary) and definitely adversarial blog reader asks me.
The book:
The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss
The Rating: Surprise! I didn't like it.
But why? Everyone else did!
This is a personal idiosyncrasy. I don't like retrospectives. *Shrug.*
That's a terrible reason not to like a book!
True! I'll expand. Maybe it's my pragmatic side speaking but when Rothfuss opened the tale with a depressed former sorcerer who is literally whiling his life away and waiting to die, bereft of all magic and also there's the distinct threat of war and giant nasty spiders that could eat everyone alive, my personal sense of self preservation just wants to know more about what that guy is going to do about his immediate problems. I don't have time to learn all about what a wunderkind he was. There's a war on! And personal healing to be done! I want to hear about how that's gonna be solved before investing in a long meandering tale about sorcerer dude's past. Only relevant insofar as it plays into his present.
So.. I skipped ahead in the book and discovered not only does this massive book not address any of Kote's current life problems, the next book (and maybe even the as yet to come final part of the trilogy) does not focus on Kote's present life challenges.
So basically, this entire trilogy is one massive prologue.
And I always skip the prologue cuz I'm impatient and I want to get to the action.
But... um... aren't you writing a fanfic inspired by this guy? On ...Twitter? (Questionable choice of medium there , btw).
Well, you know what they say! If the book you want to read hasn't been written yet by someone else... write it yourself!
And I do want to read about Kote's present life and I really am curious about how he's gonna pull through, find the will to live, and then get on with the living.
So I decided to write a bit about that.
In the extremely unlikely event he catches wind of this, Patrick Rothfuss will probably totally hate that.
Maybe? Or maybe it'll take the pressure off cuz he'll read my version of Kote and be like, "no, she got everything all wrong!" And he'll be so incensed that he'll want to write about how it really goes, and then voila, fans of Rothfuss will rejoice because he wrote the long awaited sequel.
Everyone wins!
Even me, cuz as I said I really want to know about present moment Kote and how he's gonna deal.
Also- some definitely totally good advise to Rothfuss, if you hate everything about writing this series by now, open the third book with Kote getting abruptly killed off so he can't tell the rest of his story. Then, write the rest of your book about whatever you want. Viola. Problem of third book solved.
You're welcome.
The book:
The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss
The Rating: Surprise! I didn't like it.
But why? Everyone else did!
This is a personal idiosyncrasy. I don't like retrospectives. *Shrug.*
That's a terrible reason not to like a book!
True! I'll expand. Maybe it's my pragmatic side speaking but when Rothfuss opened the tale with a depressed former sorcerer who is literally whiling his life away and waiting to die, bereft of all magic and also there's the distinct threat of war and giant nasty spiders that could eat everyone alive, my personal sense of self preservation just wants to know more about what that guy is going to do about his immediate problems. I don't have time to learn all about what a wunderkind he was. There's a war on! And personal healing to be done! I want to hear about how that's gonna be solved before investing in a long meandering tale about sorcerer dude's past. Only relevant insofar as it plays into his present.
So.. I skipped ahead in the book and discovered not only does this massive book not address any of Kote's current life problems, the next book (and maybe even the as yet to come final part of the trilogy) does not focus on Kote's present life challenges.
So basically, this entire trilogy is one massive prologue.
And I always skip the prologue cuz I'm impatient and I want to get to the action.
But... um... aren't you writing a fanfic inspired by this guy? On ...Twitter? (Questionable choice of medium there , btw).
Well, you know what they say! If the book you want to read hasn't been written yet by someone else... write it yourself!
And I do want to read about Kote's present life and I really am curious about how he's gonna pull through, find the will to live, and then get on with the living.
So I decided to write a bit about that.
In the extremely unlikely event he catches wind of this, Patrick Rothfuss will probably totally hate that.
Maybe? Or maybe it'll take the pressure off cuz he'll read my version of Kote and be like, "no, she got everything all wrong!" And he'll be so incensed that he'll want to write about how it really goes, and then voila, fans of Rothfuss will rejoice because he wrote the long awaited sequel.
Everyone wins!
Even me, cuz as I said I really want to know about present moment Kote and how he's gonna deal.
Also- some definitely totally good advise to Rothfuss, if you hate everything about writing this series by now, open the third book with Kote getting abruptly killed off so he can't tell the rest of his story. Then, write the rest of your book about whatever you want. Viola. Problem of third book solved.
You're welcome.
Review: The Ancillary Trilogy
Wherein I review sci-fi and fantasy books in the format of a conversation with a mildly rabid fellow reader. Bold are the questions my (entirely imaginary) and definitely adversarial blog reader asks me.
The book: Ok I'm cheating here because I'm reviewing the entire Ancillary series by Anne Leckie all at once. Ancillary Justice, Ancillary Sword and Ancillary Mercy are the three books that make up this trilogy.
The rating: one of my favourite series of all time. Ancillary Justice won the Hugo and the Nebula for a reason; Leckie knocked it out of the park.
The plot, in 20 words or less: A zombie cyborg defies their programming to fight against a crumbling Empire.
But why did you love it?
The coolest thing for me about the Ancillary series was how Leckie managed to write convincingly about a character that is capable of having multiple simultaneous experiences. Because the main character in this series is a starship, the Justice of Toren, the starship is constantly able to monitor multiple inputs and experiences, all happening simultaneously (through cameras on multiple decks, through sensors that monitor and analyze its crews facial expressions, body language, temperature, heart rate, even hormones.) Further, Toren has multiple Borg type ancillaries that walk both through the ship and can walk on planets, all simultaneously beaming video and data feeds back to the overarching consciousness ship itself. This means that Leckie was able to write with a near omniscient viewpoint by the narrator but still be true to that narrator's personal knowledge and experience. Ie the starship really can see multiple things happening at once, really can make assumptions about another characters internal emotional state, and so Leckie gets the benefits of writing from both an omniscient viewpoint and the personal closeness and investment that a participant narrator provides.
When one of the spaceship's ancillaries (Breq) becomes separated from the controlling consciousness of the ship, the narrative structure changes from this omniscience to a more limited point of view where the narrator can only speculate on whats happening outside of himself. I viscerally felt the extent of Breq's loss through this stylistic change, and felt disoriented to the world without Breqs former (near) omniscience. It was a masterful way to make me, the reader, experience the extent of Breq's loss.
What stood out: The dense layers of the world building. The originality of the story. The depth of the characters.
How even personal identity is scarred by violence when living under a colonialist society.
So you're saying you liked it for political reasons! Aha! Are you by chance any part of a secret cabal of hugo nominators who are working towards a nefarious goal of promoting (gasp) works by women and people of color?
Nope! But it is amazing how many people seem to believe such a cabal exists.
In sum: Anne Leckie, a female writer, wrote a book so good it deserved the Hugo, the Nebula, and (arguably most impressively!) a rare place in my "I read it twice" bookshelf.
The book: Ok I'm cheating here because I'm reviewing the entire Ancillary series by Anne Leckie all at once. Ancillary Justice, Ancillary Sword and Ancillary Mercy are the three books that make up this trilogy.
The rating: one of my favourite series of all time. Ancillary Justice won the Hugo and the Nebula for a reason; Leckie knocked it out of the park.
The plot, in 20 words or less: A zombie cyborg defies their programming to fight against a crumbling Empire.
But why did you love it?
The coolest thing for me about the Ancillary series was how Leckie managed to write convincingly about a character that is capable of having multiple simultaneous experiences. Because the main character in this series is a starship, the Justice of Toren, the starship is constantly able to monitor multiple inputs and experiences, all happening simultaneously (through cameras on multiple decks, through sensors that monitor and analyze its crews facial expressions, body language, temperature, heart rate, even hormones.) Further, Toren has multiple Borg type ancillaries that walk both through the ship and can walk on planets, all simultaneously beaming video and data feeds back to the overarching consciousness ship itself. This means that Leckie was able to write with a near omniscient viewpoint by the narrator but still be true to that narrator's personal knowledge and experience. Ie the starship really can see multiple things happening at once, really can make assumptions about another characters internal emotional state, and so Leckie gets the benefits of writing from both an omniscient viewpoint and the personal closeness and investment that a participant narrator provides.
When one of the spaceship's ancillaries (Breq) becomes separated from the controlling consciousness of the ship, the narrative structure changes from this omniscience to a more limited point of view where the narrator can only speculate on whats happening outside of himself. I viscerally felt the extent of Breq's loss through this stylistic change, and felt disoriented to the world without Breqs former (near) omniscience. It was a masterful way to make me, the reader, experience the extent of Breq's loss.
What stood out: The dense layers of the world building. The originality of the story. The depth of the characters.
How even personal identity is scarred by violence when living under a colonialist society.
So you're saying you liked it for political reasons! Aha! Are you by chance any part of a secret cabal of hugo nominators who are working towards a nefarious goal of promoting (gasp) works by women and people of color?
Nope! But it is amazing how many people seem to believe such a cabal exists.
In sum: Anne Leckie, a female writer, wrote a book so good it deserved the Hugo, the Nebula, and (arguably most impressively!) a rare place in my "I read it twice" bookshelf.
Apps: gamify nature appreciation
The pitch: an app like pokemon go that gets kids out of the house and collecting. The cat h: must collect photos of species of plants, animals, bugs that are common in their area.
Their photos are put through picture recognition software and matched. They can look at other samples of similar species to decide which one it is. Community forums can dispute a claim. The capture is then turned into a card like poke cards and gives the kids infi in the species, its enemies, its abilities.
Rare species are especially valuable.
Good for learning, conservation, citizen science data collection of population levels.
Also, and really this is the most important point- fun.
Tuesday, December 4, 2018
Camera eyes
Things we should make:
Cameras that use sensors to notice electrical sensors around your eye muscles to focus the photo at what you're looking at. The camera could be attached to your forehead triggered by blinking your eyes in a certain pattern "shave and a haircut". Bam. Photo eyes.
Cameras that use sensors to notice electrical sensors around your eye muscles to focus the photo at what you're looking at. The camera could be attached to your forehead triggered by blinking your eyes in a certain pattern "shave and a haircut". Bam. Photo eyes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





